data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ec77/5ec77221a9ace58383dfeb262b82053e1fc223cf" alt="Image credit"
Specifically, this symposium considers dimensions of performance and performativity in archival interactions: namely, interactions between and among archivists & records; scholars & documents; artists & archival scraps; artists & archivists; archives & counter-archives. In these interactions, what affects are elicited? What knowledge is produced? For many, performance remains fundamentally anarchic – defined by ephemerality in ways that place it in an inevitably antagonistic relationship to the archive. We also invite further critical consideration of the notion of being ‘counter to’ an institutional archive. Can one be ‘counter’ in the post/de/colonial? When we work with certain archives, do we foreclose the possibility of ‘countering’? Can colonial archives be mobilized in a counter archival frame? Keeping present the crucial role of “canonical black feminist work” in shaping intersectional legal work and theory, we invite participants to take up Jennifer Nash’s crucial question: “Who owns intersectionality, and who steals it?” (2019: 26). In our reflections at the symposium, we wish to engage intersectionality because in Nash’s words, it “offers the sense of collective world-making, and because it is the extension of a certain form of agency” (Ibid., 27).