At the museum, we are interested in multiple facets of this question:
- What place does the utopian horizon of the postracial (in contrast with its racially reproducing logics) play in how we construct our visions of the future?
- How has the algorithmic “become the mode not just of production but of sociality”? And what does such algorithmic thinking have to do with how we live in the presence of a constant “state of war,” one that leads to an apprehension, a sense of “continual dread”?
- How is the algorithmic racial?
- How might an analysis of “tracking-capitalism” engage queer theorizations of temporality, trouble, and/or probe our aspirational mindscapes? How is “tracking-capitalism” tied to our affective register of “dread”? What aspirational socialities might counter the sociality of tracking-capitalism" and the dread it promotes?
- How do our aspirations towards race neutrality offend those of us still so vulnerable to the visibility, which undergirds how our racialized bodies are understood by a public sphere that for the most part remains beset with a multi-century institutional framework of white privilege?
- How does a philosophical framework of Relation as per Édouard Glissant’s lifetime oeuvre and also as per the pluriversal ethics of indigenous thought (as per Arturo Escobar, María Lugones, and Rolando Vazquez) allow us to honor both our diverse aspirational imaginations and our equally unequal social realities?
For the above citations, see here.